Author Archives: ruizcor

Amigos del Pixquiac 200 Monitoring Events

Last year, on July 30th of 2023, our partners in Mexico, Amigos del Pixquiac (Friends of the Pixquiac River), joined for their 200th time to conduct one more Global Water Watch monitoring event at their beloved river. Accomplishing 200 monitoring events was an unthinkable milestone for Eduardo Aranda, who is one of the leaders of Amigos del Pixquiac and probably the GWW-Mexico monitor with the most records ever collected. I asked Eduardo to share with us some of his thoughts about reaching this milestone, and share memories and some of the many unforgettable moments he has lived while monitoring the Río Pixquiac. This is a loose translation of what Eduardo had to say about that event and his time monitoring with Amigos del Pixquiac:

It is a bit difficult for me to review and summarize the 200 water-monitoring events of the Pixquiac River in these 18 years that have passed since 2005. Because of the memories, the historical conditions, the personal circumstances, social problems, opportunities and even different emotions are certainly intermingled.

What I can say is that at that time, in the year 2005, a group of residents of Zoncuantla, residents of the Pixquiac River watershed, had the concern of being able to know or analyze the water quality of the river. The only alternative that we could recognize was to carry a sample of water to a private laboratory and request them to do some analysis, but without really knowing what tests should be or even how much it would cost us to do it, much less being able to obtain an interpretation when we had the results in our hands.

Eduardo Aranda and his fellows Amigos del Pixquiac after conducting the 200th monitoring event in their river.

Eduardo Aranda (left) and a group of Amigos del Pixquiac while conducting the 200th water monitoring event at three sites in their river on July 2023.

It was in that August of 2005 that we attended an event, with the curiosity to listen to a series of conferences that were conducted at the Institute of Ecology in the Clavijero Botanical Garden in Xalapa. There, among other topics, we were able to listen to interesting talks by colleagues from the University of Auburn, in Alabama USA, with the special charisma of Dr. Bill Deutsch and Sergio Ruiz Cordova (Guatemalan).

During those conferences, we were presented with a novel and magnificent opportunity with which, ourselves as a community, could carry out not only one isolated analysis of the water, but many periodic samplings of our river and also be able to interpret and understand the results, and draw our own conclusions and care recommendations for our river. In addition to everything, the next day we began participating in a series of training sessions to certify us as “GWW Monitors”, in which we were lucky enough to conduct the fieldwork in our Pixquiac River…!

Bill Deutsch and Sergio RuizCórdova interpreting bacteria monitoring results at the first GWW training in Mexico in 2005, Eduardo Aranda taking photos.

Bill Deutsch and Sergio RuizCórdova interpreting bacteria monitoring results at the first GWW training in Mexico in 2005, Eduardo Aranda taking photos.

That was the beginning, and our enthusiasm was capped with the generous donation of the Physical-Chemical Monitoring Kit, with which we already had everything we needed to begin monitoring, and that is how we started…!

Beautiful view of the river during a water monitoring event of the Amigos del Pixquiac.

Our initial objective as Monitors was to be able to recognize and understand the quality of the water in the Pixquiac River when arriving at, and when leaving our community in Zoncuantla. A few months later, we were invited to visit Auburn, Alabama in the United States to learn other monitoring techniques and to meet other groups that had been carrying out these activities there for a long time. The trip opened our eyes to new opportunities, not only to continue learning but also to be able to share what we knew and teach to others in our country, as we became GWW Trainers.

After our return from the GWW headquarters in Auburn, we began conducting visits and trainings in other states: Chiapas, the State of Mexico, Oaxaca and other places.  Those interactions allowed us to broaden our understanding of rivers, their similarities and differences, but above all, to meet many wonderful people with the same desire to contribute their time and effort to take care of our rivers.

I want to acknowledge the always kind and generous presence and unconditional support of Bill, Sergio, Eric Reutebuch, Mona Dominguez and many others in Auburn, as well as the companionship, support and determination of our colleagues in Xalapa. Many of whom not only have accompanied us to countless monitoring events of the three sites on the Pixquiac River, but together we saw ourselves with the opportunity and responsibility of starting Global Water Watch Mexico and thus being able to expand our reach and our influence everywhere we were asked to go.

I want to highlight that in all these 18 years of monitoring the Pixquiac River, we have had the opportunity to see the river in many, if not all of its presentations. From observing imposing and dangerous floods, moments of calm and wonderful beauty, to witness moments that we did not expect to see, with points and events of high contamination, to even periods and sections of the river, with the streambed completely dry, without a drop of water… In these 18 years, as a community we have experienced population growth problems, environmental threats, pollution attempts, as well as opportunities to enjoy a beautiful, healthy, and magnificent river that has given us beauty, peace, and gratitude. Without a doubt I can say that these 18 years have been a wonderful learning experience, of coexistence and personal growth, recommended for everyone and at any stage of our lives…!

The Pixquiac River was completely dry on May 29, 2023.

A sad view of the Pixquiac River during an unusual period of drought in 2023 .

This 200th monitoring event of our Amigos del Pixquiac was another highlight and testimony of the expansion of global environmental awareness and literacy through the Global Water Watch’s promotion of community-based, science-based watershed stewardship and water monitoring. Of course, there was a celebration with great food, fruits and drinks, as well as great conversation and camaraderie among the new and the seasoned Amigos del Pixquiac. In the end, there was a light of optimism in all the water monitors from Zoncuantla and Xalapa; there was a consensus that they are doing something good to keep their river alive and in good health. And that of course reminds me the last part of the AU WRC mission that proclaims to empower private citizens to become active stewards of water resources. GWW would like to commend the commitment of these exceptional water stewards, as very few have the dedication to achieve such an impressive milestone.

GWW Mexico on World Water Day

by: Miriam Guadalupe Ramos Escobedo, GWW Mexico Director

It has been a long time since 2005, when GWW Program Director William Deutsch gave us an illusion. It sounded so clear, so logical that it seemed to be a sure road, but his words should have also been a warning with what he said.

¨The good thing of starting GWW México from scratch is that nothing has been done, so you can make it whatever you dream; the bad thing is that NOTHING has been done¨.

Well, after 18 years of trying to spread community-based, science-based water-monitoring (CBWM) in México, I am not sure if we had a dream. We thought it was important for sure, we thought it was needed.

Bill Deutsch conversing with the author  during a 2006 water monitoring training session at the Pixquiac River.
Bill Deutsch conversing with the author during a 2006 water monitoring training session at the Pixquiac River.

That is how we began our CBWM journey in the Mexican state of Veracruz. Trying to learn all the work from the actual water monitoring, to the work behind the scenes. What is done before and after the workshops, the follow up, seeking for funds, engaging people, linking with groups, etc. In addition, something more important, trying to persuade the authorities that this participatory monitoring is a valuable tool in the strategy to ensure healthy water, healthy streams, rivers, lakes and beaches.

The GWW Mexico journey has been a long one considering that our conditions in Mexico are quite different from the conditions in Alabama, therefore our groups usually do not survive without a funded project that can provide the resources to sustain the monitoring. Many people in Mexico are new to the culture of volunteering, mostly in such a systematic way as needed for long term water monitoring. In addition, some people want to see fast results, after 3 to 6 months if nothing has changed they start to lose interest.

Nevertheless, there is still a great need for information on water, and somehow, we keep going.

We have found people that just want to know if their water is safe, or why they get rashes when they take a shower. Other people want to have data to make a statement with the government. And a few others want to know why they cannot find wildlife there anymore, animals and plants that used to populate their streams.

Each group is a story and a journey, each group represents a different challenge. But even if most of our groups cannot last long term, they go thru a process that helps them see their water resources and freshwater ecosystems with a different perspective. So this week, the week of World Water Day, several thing are going on with our friends.

ss

In our beloved state of Veracruz the first GWW water monitoring group that was established in Mexico, the Amigos del Pixquiac, is still quite active. They collaborate with the organization Vecinos del Pixquiac Zoncuantla and have been pursuing a bureaucratic procedure that has no precedent in Mexico. After almost six years of conversations, they finally are obtaining their Pixquiac River riparian zone officially delimited in collaboration with CONAGUA, the national water authority.

GWW, AP, CONAGUA
Amigos del Pixquiac conducting water testing along representatives from CONAGUA and GWW Mexico during World Water Day 2023 at the Pixquiac River, as part of the comparison of citizen monitoring techniques with the national authority methods and be recognized officially as first alert.

Something else is also happening about 700 km west of Veracruz, on the banks of the southern part of the Pátzcuaro Lake, in the city of Huecorio in the state of Michoacán. There, members of the group CECyTEM are presenting the results of their GWW community-based water monitoring to the Asamblea Purépecha. The Purépecha are one of the many ethnic groups in México, and they subsist greatly from fishing as they mainly live around the Pátzcuaro and Cuitzeo lakes.

CECyTEM students conducting bacteriological monitoring at a spring.
CECyTEM students conducting bacteriological monitoring at a spring in Michoacán.
Michoacan
CECyTEM students conducting water chemistry monitoring and biomonitoring in Michoacán.

South of Mexico City, in the state of Morelos, GWW monitors in Cuautla are also presenting their results from water quality and biodiversity at the Fifth Festival of the Río Cuautla. This group actually found an endangered fish while conducting their water monitoring this month!

Morelosa
Notification of the finding of an endangered fish specie during a stream biomonitoring in Morelos, Mexico.

Getting back to our state of Veracruz, in the city of Naolinco, the GWW group is summarizing water-monitoring data gathered from 2007 to 2021 with the participation of the community. The community also collaborated in the mitigation of wastewater pollution with the construction of an artificial wetland to direct and treat their sewage instead of discharging it directly into the streams.

Naolincoa
E. coli monitoring locations along the Naolinco River watershed.

GWW Mexico collaboration and accomplishments go beyond Veracruz and all of Mexico. Conversations for more than a year with the Fundación Manzana Verde, a group in the Biobío region in Chile, led to a visit last year from them to Veracruz. During their visit, they learn from the GWW Mexican experience, meeting local monitors, observing and practicing water monitoring. After returning to Chile, a big Chilean group got certified as GWW water monitors in September 2022 and started monitoring. Recently we have heard that they are in conversations with the regional government to receive funding and have the opportunity to expand and consolidate the CBWM over there.

So, it has been a long journey, full of bumps, falls, lots of work and with a blurry road ahead sometimes.  However, after 18 years, we can celebrate our accomplishments. The GWW Mexico database holds almost 14,000 water monitoring data records: 5,487 bacteriological records, 6,549 water chemistry records, 257 biomonitoring records, 868 stream flow records and 801 total suspended solids records. In addition, this World Water Day, we added a new feature in our water data webpage to reflect the energy of the people that want to get things moving related to water: a button to show data obtained by punctual sampling, not necessarily systematic monitoring, because we are in so much need of information that every drop counts!

odba
Online access to the GWW Mexico community-based water monitoring data.

Visit us at http://gww-mexico.org/

HAPPY WORLD WATER DAY!!!

GWW in Chile

The return to Santiago was, as usual as it is after most Global Water Watch (GWW) trips, filled with the nostalgia that you get when leaving the extraordinary people, with whom you have been sharing many wonderful moments for days. Concepcion is about 500 km (~310 miles) south of Santiago, so the trip took about six hours by bus, along the valley between the beautiful Pacific Ocean on the west and the magnificent and breathtaking Andes on the east. Most passengers went to sleep as the bus was an extremely comfortable two-decker, but I stayed awake admiring the side of the road. Agricultural and silvicultural fields kept appearing as Chile is a big producer and exporter of fresh fruit, wine, and forestry products. We crossed over many rivers: Itata, Ñuble, Longavi, Achibueno, Putagán, Maule, Tinguiririca, Cachipoal, and Maipo near the entrance to Santiago. The bus also passed along towns whose names I have heard many times through the songs of Violeta Parra, ‘The Mother of Latin American folk’; Parral, Perquilauquén, Chillán. Thanks to life, that has given me so much; it has given me the stride of my tired feet, with them I have traversed through cities and puddles, valleys and deserts, mountains, and plains. Beautiful lyrics and music that still are an emblem of the socially, economically, and politically marginalized peoples of Latin America and their ongoing struggle for justice in all aspects; environmental, social, political, you name it.

The Biobio River entering the Pacific Ocean in Chile.

After several years of virtual communications, finally this was our first — post-COVID— trip to Chile on behalf of GWW, the larger umbrella of citizen water monitoring groups based in the Auburn University Water Resources Center (AU-WRC) in the USA. The trip was possible after a couple of years of conversations and a result of a strong collaboration with the NGO  Fundación Manzana Verde  (FMV) which is based in the city of Concepción, Chile. The main goal of this trip was to conduct community-based, science-based watershed stewardship (CBWS) workshops with GWW certifications in bacteriological monitoring, stream biomonitoring, and water chemistry monitoring, and as part of coordinating the expansion of GWW CBWS activities in Chile with FMV.

The mission of FMV is to promote sustainable development considering all kinds of integrating approaches. That is why it uses dynamics where diversity is sought in participation not based on gender, race, physical or mental ability, age or species. FMV places itself in a biocentric paradigm, betting on the restoration of balance, where all diversities are essential. This translates into a work ethic that aims to repair the gaps that are usually embedded in the work logic of human groups. FMV leaders learned about GWW and how it works, leading to conversations about cooperative work and are developing a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to be signed by FMV and GWW. The purpose of the MOU is to coordinate the fostering of Community-Based, Science-Based Watershed Stewardship (CBWS), and citizen-based water monitoring in the Chilean Biobío region, and beyond.

The Biobío River is the second largest river in Chile, originating in the Andes and flowing through mountains and valleys for 380 km (about 236 mi) before entering the Pacific Ocean not too far from Concepcion. It has been important to the country, to the extent that one of the 16 political regions in Chile carries that name, whose capital is in the city of Concepcion. The Biobío River also has exceptional cultural importance since for over 300 years it represented the historic border between the Spanish conquerors and the Mapuche people; witnessing bloody battles, agreements, and betrayals. This has prompted some people to describe the Biobío with words such as life, spirit, border, and obstacle.

The Mapuche people are the largest ethnic group in Chile with approximately 10% (more than 1.000.000 people) of the Chilean population. However, it was not until 1993 that was officially accepted for the first time in the history of Chile that the country is a multiethnic society. This gave the Mapuche more protection and respect; nevertheless, they are still quite vulnerable, are seen as second-class citizens, and have less opportunities and difficulties in getting education, and jobs, where typically are underpaid. Many FMV leaders and collaborators identify themselves as Mapuche.

The highlight of the GWW activities in Chile occurred from September 30th through October 2nd in the city of Tomé, not far from Concepcion, where 34 members from the communities of Tomé, Penco, Laja, Los Alamos, Junquillar, Concepcion, Isla Mocha and Futaleufú, participated in the GWW training sessions on bacteriological monitoring, physical and chemical monitoring, and stream biomonitoring using macroinvertebrates.

GWW trainees in Chile.
GWW monitors in the Biobio Region of Chile.

The hands-on activities for the physical and chemical water testing as well as the actual stream biomonitoring training went well with practice conducted at the Estero Nachur before entering the city of Tomé. After a few minutes of sampling with a kick net, numerous bugs were collected and sorted into 12 different taxa with a plethora of macroinvertebrates present in each tolerance group. Notable was the presence of macros that are extremely sensitive to pollution (six taxa from Group I) such as mayflies, stoneflies, and caddisflies, as well as hellgrammites and crabs from the genus Aegla sp. (four taxa in Group II). The final biotic index calculated was 28, providing a stream assessment of “excellent”; which, taking into consideration that aquatic macros are the best, and obviously more consistent (24/7), water monitors, reflects the exceptional quality of the Estero Nachur at that site. Physical and chemical water characteristics tested at this site provided values considered good quality for aquatic life including a neutral pH of 7.0 and dissolved oxygen of 9.5 ppm. Bacteriological monitoring for E. coli presence was conducted at three sites along the Estero Nachur providing evidence of almost no pollution before entering the city, and more contamination downstream.  

Citizen-based water monitoring with GWW is expanding in Chile.

The new GWW monitors including students, teachers and community members believe that this certification will improve their abilities as environmental monitors. They feel that participatory community environmental surveillance and water monitoring are valuable tools for self-advocacy. And there is no better way to express it as in the own words of FMV Esteban Flores: this weekend a collective dream for FMV came true when we learn how to use tools that will catapult us towards (water) data autonomy for our basins… and here is the teaser of the audiovisual material that documents this experience. But we also learned about ourselves, with a network that extends from Futaleufú, passes through the Biobío, stops at Laja, in parallel goes through Isla Mocha, shifts north reaching Antihuala and Pangue, moves through Junquillar, encompasses the Chimalfe wetland, goes up and down through Nonguén and Andalién, walks towards Penco and expands all the way to the Tomesinas basins. A network of monitors, a network of people, of hearts and love for our waters. A step forward towards our territorial sovereignty, autonomy of our basins data, decision-making for ecological health, the restoration of our basins, the recovery of our ecosystems and new human-nature relations. Thank you Esteban, we the GWW visitors also found very rewarding, enjoyable and educational our visit to Chile.

A group of new GWW monitors in Chile

Other GWW activities during this trip included a visit to the University of Concepcion, a tour of the Hydrology Department laboratories and conversations about possible academic, research and outreach cooperation and exchanges between them and Auburn University. This GWW trip to Chile was another step to expand global environmental awareness and literacy through community-based, science-based watershed stewardship and water monitoring. After the trainings there was a light of hope in the new water monitors from those communities; and that made me recall the last part of the AU WRC mission that says empower private citizens to become active stewards of water resources.

2022 was a Wonderful Year! Thank You! 2023 shall be better! 

I hope All of you had a wonderful 2022 and a joyful end of the year festivities! 

It is already mid-January, so I decided to send this quick note to thank you for all that was possible for GWW (Global Water Watch) this past year on this amazing journey of encouraging water monitoring and living as a role model for watershed stewardship. The results of GWW activities I personally witnessed in the past year have been nothing short of ASTOUNDING. As for GWW, the year 2022 confidently was a wonderful one. 

It is a joy to read emails, Facebook posts or WhatsApp messages from people who have had amazing breakthroughs with their water monitoring or other environmental stewardship experiences; and of course, much more from other personal accomplishments or situations. 

It is your commitment to become a reliable monitor, to make changes and live a life more in harmony with the environment, enjoying and respecting nature and the outdoors that makes what we do possible, and we are incredibly grateful for that. We are happy for those new people that decide to re-integrate the rivers into their lifestyle. After the traveling hiatus due to Covid, 2022 gave GWW the opportunity to get back on the road.  

This past year has been quite a ride, starting with a May trip to Mexico to attend and present at the VIII Mexican Congress of Ecology that over 1,000 people attended! Which what followed by a series of field sessions conducting stream biomonitoring along with personnel from the Mexico Water Commission –CONAGUA. In addition, we ended up assisting at a laboratory on the preparation of all the reagents used for water chemistry monitoring, which are extremely expensive and almost impossible to find in our closest neighboring country. 

GWW Stream Biomonitoring in Mexico.

In September, we got the opportunity to share experiences and expand what GWW does for watershed stewardship, with a wonderful audience in the southern hemisphere, in the province of Concepcion in Chile. A selected group of 36 citizens successfully completed certifications in bacteriological monitoring, water chemistry monitoring, and stream biomonitoring. 

Sharing GWW water monitoring with children in Chile.

Finally, after about ten years absence, in November GWW got us back to the shores and watersheds of the Titicaca Lake in Peru. About 50 new water monitors completed trainings in the Cuzco and Puno departments. GWW participation in Peru included presenting at an Andean Forum, a press conference; a radio broadcast and many other meetings. Highlight of the trip is the beginning of an incredibly positive interaction with Bolivian partners concerned about the potential opening of a new mining operation in a watershed shared by communities in both countries. 

GWW water chemistry monitoring training in Peru.

Additional GWW monitoring activities, environmental education activities and trainings in 2022 took place in Costa Rica plus the US states of Mississippi and Washington. 

GWW has been also attending virtual meetings of the, now a year-old organization, RED CAMCPA. This is a network of people working or interested in working on community-based, participatory water monitoring in the American continent, with representation of many Latin-American countries. The RED CAMCPA is a regional reference platform that is trying to unite social actors to conserve and restore the rivers of the American Continent through participatory community water monitoring. The network plans to have their first in-person meeting in 2023 in Chile. 

GWW monitoring at an interesting confluence in Mexico.

It is difficult to express my gratitude through these few lines for all this work and to every one of you out there reading this, monitoring and growing with us as better watershed stewards… 

So, all I can say is thank you! Keep monitoring. It is fun, it is entertaining, it is enriching. And never forget that your monitoring data is useful; it may not work miracles, but it will work wonders. During the beginning of 2023, chose to be a better watershed steward, monitor as much as you did in 2022; or more, if you think you fell short on your monitoring goal last year. Choose to let go of old excuses and commit to making time to go out once every month and monitor, with enthusiasm, with hope, with love, and with passion. 

Until next time… Happy and Prosperous 2023 filled with health, happiness, patience, and perseverance … and Keep Monitoring! 

GWW Peru Update

This past Thanksgiving Day I was in Peru’s Highlands taking a short vacation, as some would say. These highlands are so beautiful and breathtaking that I could stay there forever, admiring them. The mountains are high, the valleys immense, all above the tree line (approximately 3,900 meters or 12,800 ft above sea level) and covered with grasses. Most communities survive on small self-sustained agriculture, few cows and large herds of alpaca, llamas and sheep. 

I returned to Perú after about 10 years, on behalf of Global Water Watch (GWW), the larger umbrella of citizen water monitoring groups based in the Auburn University Water Resources Center (AU-WRC) in the US. The trip was possible after a couple of years of conversations and a result of a strong collaboration of the NGO Derechos Humanos y Medio Ambiente ꟷDHUMA  (Human Rights and Environment) which is based in Puno, Peru and is developing a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to be signed by DHUMA and GWW. The purpose of the MOU is to coordinate the fostering of Community-Based, Science-Based Watershed Stewardship (CBWS), and citizen-based water monitoring in the Peruvian Departments of Puno, Cuzco, and beyond. The main goal of this trip was to conduct CBWS workshops with GWW certifications in bacteriological monitoring, stream biomonitoring, and water chemistry monitoring, and to coordinate the expansion of GWW CBWS activities in Peru with DHUMA.  

The GWW activities during this trip started, with the collaboration of the NGO Human rights without Borders, in the city of Espinar, in the Cuzco region, where twenty-one community members were certified as water chemistry monitors. We conducted monitoring practices on the Apurimac River, the water source for several of the communities. Afterwards, we shared and discussed the water chemistry monitoring results.  

The next stop for GWW activities was in the city of Puno, where 35 community members, some of them already environmental water watchers and monitors, from Yacango, Coata and Caracoto, participated on November 13 and 14 in the GWW sessions on bacteriological monitoring, physical and chemical monitoring, and stream biomonitoring using macroinvertebrates. The new GWW monitors including students, teachers and community members believe that this certification will improve their abilities to monitor. They feel that participatory community environmental surveillance and water monitoring are valuable tools for self-advocacy. 

A highlight of the trip was a visit to the Condoraque watershed; where I had been back in 2009, when GWW traveled to Puno to conduct the first water monitoring workshops, which included some community members from Condoraque. Since the late 1970s, the communities along the Condoraque River had been seeing their river turn from a healthy river to a yellowish river carrying the outflow of a mining operation at the top of the mountain. Villagers referred to the Condoraque River as “burning waters” because of the toxic waste coming from the mine upstream, which made the river untouchable. The original mining company left in the 1990s, and did no type of reclamation. In 2010, the Condoraque case concerns were presented to the United Nations in New York. As a result, the second company that bought the mining rights of the area agreed to the condition that it would repair the environmental damage caused by the first mine. 

This time, the view of the Condoraque River was different. A consultant group, Cumbres del Sur, has been working on remediating the mining damage and their efforts have been effective so far. A water treatment plant was installed and is treating the water still flowing from the mine, right next to the Choquene Lagoon, that held most of the contaminated effluents and has been dredged, and flora and fauna can be seen back in the water and shores. Downstream, on the river, I picked up some rocks from the channel and found macroinvertebrates and saw some fish. 

Choquene Lagoon and surroundings before and after remediation.

A group of Condoraque residents came along to the visit and guided tour of the treatment plant by the Choquene Lagoon; they are happy that the river is returning to life, yet they still see the need to continue the remediation work downstream. Although this looks and sounds like a win for nature and the indigenous communities in Condoraque, it is only one of hundreds of rivers and watersheds in Peru, that are in the same situation Condoraque was 10 years ago. Only two days before we had visited the Llallimayo River, and the view there is very sad. 

We got up at 3 am to reach the Jatun Ayllu River up in the mountain near the Aruntani S.A.C. mine. The trip from Puno takes almost 5 hours, so after a while we stopped for a big breakfast in the city of Ayaviri, which lays on the north side of the river. After about one hour from Puno, the road more or less follows the Llallimayo riverbanks for many miles. Both the Condoraque and Llallimayo rivers flow into Lake Titicaca carrying a load of heavy metals. The lake that straddles the border of Bolivia and Peru and was once revered, has become a dumping site for trash, and the fish from the lake that is a staple in many diets in the region, contain dangerous levels of cadmium, lead, mercury, and other heavy metals. Recent blood and urine tests from residents, including children ages 4-14, along the Coata River near Juliaca revealed high levels of arsenic and mercury. 

As stream enthusiasts usually do, at the confluence of the Jatun Ayllu River with a clean tributary flowing from an undisturbed mountain, I got near the water and picked up rocks from the channels, looking for life. The rocks on the clean creek were covered with macroinvertebrates, mayflies, amphipods and other; while the rocks from the Jatun Ayllu were covered with a thick layer of yellowish sediment containing who knows what. For over ten years, that has been the life of the residents downstream from the mine, a yellow river that sometimes turns orange and other times green. They have condemned the pollution of the tributaries of these basins, the death and malformation of their alpacas, sheep and cattle and the disappearance of cultivation pastures. 

The gold mining industry is one of the most destructive industries and has a devastating impact on ecosystems worldwide. I never had a gold ring, but realize that for many it is quite important. Yet, next time you buy a gold ring consider the following: Earthworks estimates that to produce enough raw gold to make a single ring, 20 tons of rock and soil are dislodged and discarded, producing waste that carries mercury and cyanide, which are used to extract the gold from the rock. Gold mining may be done with less environmental impact, and as we saw in Condoraque, some of the damage can be prevented. 

This GWW trip to Peru was another step to expand global environmental awareness and literacy through community-based, science-based watershed stewardship and water monitoring. After the trainings I could see a little light of hope in the new water monitors from those communities; and that made me recall the last part of the AU WRC mission that says empower private citizens to become active stewards of water resources


					

Happy 2020 Volunteers!


Happy 2020
A VERY HAPPY AND PROSPEROUS 2020 GLOBAL WATER WATCHERS!

Looking back at 2019… 
it was a very busy yet an extraordinary year for GWW. Intense journeys were accomplished in Argentina, Costa Rica, Mexico and the US to spread the word about watershed stewardship. Thanks for your participation and support to GWW, hundreds of people were introduced and encouraged to take a personal and holistic approach to watershed stewardship and monitoring. All with the goal of an improved quality of life and a sustainable future for our planet, where upcoming generations share water and natural resources with sustainability and equability. We look forward to keep collaborating with you and celebrate another year of success and partnership in 2020.
The GWW Team.

Here are some highlights from 2019… GWW Mexico continues strongly expanding citizen-based water monitoring across the country. A large long term project funded by the World Bank was successfully completed. New projects will allow for GWW-Mexico to continue their water monitoring activities. A new training center in Costa Rica has opened up a great opportunity for international partners to attend GWW certifications, as traveling to that country is easier compared to traveling to the US. GWW training was conducted there with participants from Costa Rica, Honduras, and Guatemala. GWW activities in the Argentinian Patagonia continue with such success that has attracted the attention of residents in the Chilean side of Patagonia. Close to the GWW home, a new 3-year project was awarded to expand GWW activities to the State of Mississippi. GWW in the State of Washington also had a very strong 2019 with the collection of hundreds of water monitoring records. Maintaining and updating the GWW online databases in the GWW website water data portals was again one of our major challenges as web development software develops and GWW has to keep up with this critical feature of citizen monitoring.  Visit the GWW website to explore water data from the different country partners and please send us any feedback about your experience!
Your active and dedicated participation with GWW has made all of this possible.We look forward to continuing this rewarding journey with all our network friends in 2020.
Link

A mediados de enero, se promovió un muestreo relámpago de contaminación fecal que cubrió principalmente cuerpos de agua de la cuenca alta del Río La Antigua y la zona Metropolitana de Xalapa, la cual abarca una pequeña porción de la cuenca del río Actopan. Se incluyeron los municipios de Quimixtlán, Ixhuatlán de los Reyes, Xico, San Andrés Tlalnehuayocan, Banderilla, Xalapa, Emiliano Zapata, Coatepec, Teocelo, Cosautlán, Jalcomulco, Puente Nacional y Paso de Ovejas.

Se muestrearon 115 sitios en 61 cuerpos de agua; principalmente arroyos y ríos, pero también se monitorearon lagunas y lagos, cuerpos de agua en parques urbanos, pozos y manantiales. En este trabajo participaron 59 monitores voluntarios provenientes de organizaciones de la sociedad civil, grupos de monitores de GWW México, instituciones académicas, escuelas preparatorias y ciudadanos independientes.

De acuerdo con los resultados obtenidos y atendiendo los estándares de la Organización Mundial de la Salud,

  • El 17% de los sitios muestreados es apto para consumo humano, ya que no se detectaron coliformes fecales.
  • El 32% es seguro para contacto humano,
  • En un 12% entrar en contacto con su agua puede ser riesgoso y,
  • en un 57% el contacto o inmersión representa un riesgo para la salud.
  • En el 56% de estos sitios el nivel de contaminación superó los 1000 coliformes fecales en 100 mililitros, lo que significa que el agua no puede ser potabilizada.

Aquí los

RESULTADOS

 

“Monitoreo Relámpago (Blitz) de contaminación fecal en la cuenca Alta de la Antigua”

El pasado 13 y 14 de enero se realizó un Blitz en la cuenca alta de la Antigua con la participación de 59 monitores que cubrieron 113 sitios en 14 municipios. Más del 50% de estos sitios se encontraron en la Zona Metropolitana de Xalapa y la mayoría en ríos aunque también se muestrearon fuentes de abastecimiento (manantiales y tomas y cajas de agua). La finalidad fue hacer una prospección del estado de contaminación fecal de los cuerpos de agua para poner el tema en la agenda pública de las administraciones municipales entrantes. Un interés fuerte de los participantes fue visibilizar el impacto de las zonas urbanas sobre los ríos. En diciembre de 2017, GWW-México convocó a organizaciones de la sociedad civil y grupos de monitores para participar en el Blitz, buscando éstos definieran sitios de su interés tomando como referente territorial la cuenca alta de la Antigua. Dado el interés de los participantes y la fuerte presión ambiental que ejerce la Zona Metropolitana de Xalapa, se incluyeron sitios de subcuencas del Actopan y aguas abajo hasta Paso Mariano y Paso de Ovejas (Figura 1).

 

Figura 1. Participación de monitores voluntarios durante el Blitz, desde la planeación hasta la colecta y procesamiento de muestras.

Un 32% de los sitios analizados son seguros para contacto humano (recreativo), de hecho en la mitad de ellos no se detectó contaminación fecal, esto sucedió principalmente en afluentes aguas arriba o alejados de asentamientos humanos, en fuentes de abastecimiento como manantiales, pozos y cajas de agua. En un 12% de los sitios muestreados se detectó un nivel de coliformes fecales para el que la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) recomienda poco contacto humano; el resto de los sitios (54%) se considera peligroso por su nivel de contaminación fecal (Figura 2).

Algunos de los sitios muy contaminados están en arroyos en los que se vierten los drenajes de comunidades rurales, entre los que destacan los sitios localizados un poco aguas abajo de la toma de agua para Xalapa ubicada en Quimixtlán; aunque la mayor parte de estos sitios, empiezan a aparecer en los ríos y arroyos que pasan cerca o cruzan las ciudades de Xalapa y Coatepec. Su situación empeora conforme avanzan en estás urbes y se prolonga aguas abajo de las mismas. Los ríos con una contaminación más acuciada se encuentran en Xalapa, se une a este grupo el río Pintores de Coatepec. En contraste, hay manantiales dentro de las zonas urbanas con excelente calidad del agua. Dentro de la Zona Conurbada, el río Pixquiac se mantiene en buenas condiciones hasta que llega a Mariano Escobedo, de ahí en adelante sufre un franco deterioro.

Este boletín es una primera aproximación a los datos y evidencia el impacto negativo de las comunidades y las urbes, pero también la presencia de manantiales dentro de las ciudades que se han conservado. Es necesario que después de esta primera fase de trabajo se realicen una o varias reuniones con los monitores para terminar de validar los datos.

Figura 2. Resultados del monitoreo de contaminación fecal. Las categorías recomendadas por la OMS están en UFC de E.coli/100mL. 0 es apta para consumo, <200 apto para contacto humano, de 201 a 600 se recomienda poco contacto humano, >600 es peligroso. Un cuerpo de agua con más de 1000 UFC de E.coli/100mL no es apto para potabilizarse.

Los datos duros obtenidos verse en el siguiente enlace: https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/viewer?mid=1R_UII8ZgzUeySZF0AA_AAaPMd1Qk2mkR&ll=19.448258068877806%2C-96.88352178906246&z=9.

Para tener una visión más completa de la situación de los ríos en la cuenca Alta de la Antigua -Zona Metropolitana de Xalapa y vincular a sus habitantes, en el futuro se requerirá un esfuerzo extra para interesar a habitantes de las zonas rurales e incrementar sitios en las mismas. En este sentido, esta experiencia de monitoreo masivo se apoyó en capacidades que GWW México ha construido en la zona y sirvió como primer paso para vincular a grupos de ciudadanos voluntarios y OSCs dentro de varias subcuencas que comparten la misma problemática. Algunos de estos ciudadanos y grupos están involucrados con C6, colaboran con GWW México o con la Coalición de organizaciones de la Biorregión Jamapa-Antigua, de la cual GWW México forma parte.